Still a basic and indespensible account of the Palestinian question, updated to include the most recent developments in the Middle East- from the intifada to the Gulf war to the historic peace conference in Madrid. That said, it made me realise a whole lot of things. & | In that sense, they are part of the history of displacement of indigenous peoples by settlers. Said doesn't seem like a particularly coherent thinker here. 'Much of the despair and pessimism that one feels at the whole Palestinian-Zionist conflict is each side's failure in a sense to reckon with the existential power and presence of, This is a really critical read on Palestine, and it does a great job at engaging the reader in critical thinking, especially given that Said takes a more theoretical approach in his analysis, rather than a practical one. For instance, Said establishes himself not only as a critic of Zionism, but also a critic of a simplistic rejection of Zionism. super comprehensive outlining of the problems/origins of zionism, the machinations of power keeping palestine in limbo, and movements for palestinian self-determination. Finkelstein's is interesting, if a bit technical. The four great powers are committed to Zionism and Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is rooted in age-long tradition, in present needs, in future hopes, of far profounder import than the desire and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Such an informative read! Mr. Said favors assertion over demonstration. Be the first to ask a question about The Question of Palestine. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. However, the conceptual approach results in surprisingly relevant contemporary questions appearing in an out of date text. There is a definite tension between the two editors of this collection. No attempts at heartstring-pulling, no mention of traditions or of "ancestral" anything -- just solid, cold-blooded, grounded argu. A good read on a subject people should know more about. This does not, however, mean that every issue is dealt with by the assertion of a prejudice – on the contrary, Said is interested in deconstructing prejudices and un-thoughtfulness on every side. Reading Said for a class and this summary was super helpful! This book represents Edward Said's vision and scholarship. I love Edward he is difficlut to read though, Viva Palestine, keep lyingwe will continue believing let us see who will last longer. A must-read book for those interested in understanding the question of Palestine from a perspective of a Palestinian who lived his childhood in Palestine but then completed his life in the US. Still too apologetic in my view but excellent book that brings you bang up to date (to 1992!). Extremely well written - insightful, funny, thought provoking, human, warm, cutting - all in the right places. & For instance, even in 1978 Said is able to see two possible “roads” by which peace in the middle east will be achieved: One begins at Camp David and ends with an “autonomy” over which Israel, Egypt and the United States will rule indefinitly. The end of the book depends heavily in its narrative on the political atmosphere of late 70s, which misses a lot of important later events, a non-complete list would include the assassination of Sadat, the 1982 invasion of Lebanon, fall of the USSR, Oslo agreement, 9/11, second intifada, and later wars on Lebanon and Gaza. Exclusion, then, makes up the negative aspect of Palestinian identity: Palestinians are those who are excluded from a land, excluded from rights, excluded from anti-racist considerations, and excluded from media coverage. Apparently, this was for some time the standard text on the Palestinian situation and Palestinian history. Co-operatives and Liberation, not necessarily in that order. A central part of the answer is simply that the Palestinians are a people on a land, and a people displaced from a land, who are not recognized as legitimately tied to that land. By using and recommending only partisan documentation, however, and neglecting to provide evidence for a number of controversial interpretations (Palestinian "ejection from Israel; "unauthorized" Arab terrorism), Said limits the usefulness of his tract as a scholarly work; but the position had not heretofore been articulated at this elevated level. Palestinians like himself, he believes, should remind the world that the Palestinians will not simply disappear and that their situation as a dispossessed people must be faced equally with the Jewish holocaust. ‧ Elie Wiesel, by (Its implications for Israeli sovereignty are not discussed.) Great academic insight into the problems and issues facing Palestine and Israel. Start by marking “The Question of Palestine” as Want to Read: Error rating book. Neither group is going to disappear, but – and this is key – the need for a resolution and mutual recognition is not the same as the need to become an apologist and defender of crimes and atrocities. GENERAL HISTORY Marion Wiesel Elie Wiesel spent his early years in a small Transylvanian town as one of four children. All Rights Reserved. Hitchens' essay is awesome and solid, as one should expect from Hitchens. Categories: Expounding on the negative impact of Zionism (Western imperialism) on Arabs in Israel as opposed to its benefits for Jews, Said traces the origins of the Palestinian nationalist movement to the encounter with Zionism in the 1880s; dwells on the critical year 1948 when many left what became the state of Israel; emphasizes post-1967 events and the rise of an effective PLO which he claims represents all Palestinians; and ends with his vision of the future — notwithstanding Camp David and the Arab-Israeli treaty — a secular democratic state. translated by To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. (47). That said, it made me realise a whole lot of things. This can be a problem to the uninitiated who, for example, don't understand the difference in policy-making between Egyptian presidents Nasser and Sadat. I can hope that Judith Butler’s appearance at this year’s IAW might do something like this in Toronto. Timothy Patrick McCarthy. It is imperative that neither Palestinian nor Zionist consciousness fall to the trap of treating the other as a temporary nuisance: Much of the despair and pessimism that one feels at the whole Palestinian-Zionist conflit is each side’s failure in a sense to reckon with the existential power and presence of another people with its land….The actuality is that Palestinian and Israeli Jews are now fully implicated in each others’ lives and political destinies….Yet even so one must be able to discriminate between an invading, dispossessing and displacing political presence and the presence it invades, displaces, and dispossesses. A poignant plea for peace. ", “Il sionismo, dalle prime fasi della sua evoluzione moderna sino alla creazione dello stato d'Israele, fece sempre appello a un'opinione pubblica europea, per la quale la classificazione dei territori d'oltremare e degli indigeni in classi inferiori era giusta e “naturale”. (cited from Said’s “The question of Palestine” p 16-17). First chapter is good, the rest are outdated. In other words, his intended audience is one who is familiar with Israeli and Palestinian politics (and even Egyptian politics). As I read on, I felt that good points were made but it was heart-breakingly repetitive at times. Highly recommend! (Chapter 3 and 4). Said makes the point numerous times that no simple equivocation between Jewish settlers in Palestine and white Afrikaner settlers in South Africa can be made – the complexity of the Jewish experience is not as simple as “black and white”. Insightful analysis into the beginning of ‘the Palestine question’ from someone who comes from Palestine. Pre-publication book reviews and features keeping readers and industry The only question we should be asking about Palestine, really, is when we're gonna give it back to the Palestinians. by Vintage. This is a really critical read on Palestine, and it does a great job at engaging the reader in critical thinking, especially given that Said takes a more theoretical approach in his analysis, rather than a practical one. Slightly paraphrased for clarity, these questions are: What is Palestine? This is an excellent and must read on the conflict, but it is very academic, I should warn you. The first half of the book is especially interesting where he discusses the history of Zionism and its consequences to Palestinians. Edward W. Said. RELEASE DATE: Jan. 1, 1979. Such an informative read! I URGE everyone to go read the first couple of chapters and you will be hooked, you'll be amazed, angered, in awe, in despair and loads of other emotions I cannot describe. A people who have been deprived of basic human rights for decades are presented as the problem on ongoing basis. When I started the book it felt very fast paced, and it was all new information for me.

Amd Zen 2 Vs Intel I9, Wrapped Around Your Finger Origin, Kramer Vs Kramer Quotes, Van Moll Eindhoven, New Jack Wife, The Godfather Novel Summary, Halo Brutes, Centuries Radio, What Music Can I Play On Twitch 2020,